The Samurai’s Cut
I had a 3-hour business meeting in the middle of the magical sand dunes of Hanstholm, not far from where I live, in the Danish national park Thy.
I felt a specific exhilaration about having the freedom to talk about small money and big money, ranging from 2-figure to 7-figure plans.
But what excited me the most was the fact that the whole time I went about explaining and demonstrating what I work with and why, I needed to press no buttons whatsoever.
It was as if I walked into things and things walked into me because things were exactly as they were, in that moment, focused and moving with the precision of a samurai’s cut between zooming in and zooming out.
Zooming in and zooming out is an interesting activity in and of itself, but I have to say that I get a particular kick out of noticing what happens in the space between zooming in and zooming out, for you see, that’s when the samurai knows what happens next before whatever it is to happen happens.
In much of my cartomantic teachings I refer to martial arts and the sword of a master samurai. I like to think of my work with the cards as making perfect cuts.
I’m interested in ‘killing it,’ no matter what IT is.
But what I don’t often stress is that a samurai is only a master if he can die a natural death.
Why does this fascinate me?
For the simple reason because I find that to stay a master, you must be willing to learn new moves all the time. In this learning you take risks, you dumb yourself down, and pay acute attention.
So the condition for maintaining mastery when your tool is a sharp blade is not to relax – now you killed your competition – but to stay vigilant and learn. If you can die a natural death with your sword by your bed, then you’re a master. I aim for that.
Meanwhile, when we talk about small money and big money, what we’re talking about is a way of developing method strategies that can fit personal business and juridical business.
In legal parlance we distinguish between natural persons (such as a human being) and juridical persons (such as a firm).
I like to work with both because I like the dynamics of shifting between concerns: When working with people there are ‘feelings’ involved, and I like to check with my own mind about just what I make of feelings (mine and the other’s alike).
How do I bend my sword over the thought ‘feeling’, and make the other and myself understand that ‘feeling’ is just a word, a consequence, a bi-product of the mind and its linguistic competence?
When working with firms there’s just steel. Firms have different ‘feelings’. Sometimes I like a firm, whose spine is made of steel, to cross its blade with my cartomatic sword. The sound makes me nostalgic for 2 reasons: Once I seriously entertained the idea of a career as a judge, and then I often have dreams in which I am a skilled knife thrower. I say ‘skilled’ because I never die in the dream, while a lot of others do.
What I do for firms is design models with cards, and sometimes send the staff to hell for a baptism of detachment. On my terms, as I’m the boss.
In this context I also honor a different code of confidence and discretion. For instance, the models I design for firms don’t get shared in the social media. I take big money to keep this secret.
Your genius unsurpassed
But what I find that I can share is this:
You can go far with your genius if you know two things:
- How to survey the scope of what you’re doing, how you’re doing it, and why (or for how much, if you’re a business).
- How to focus. For each of the three – what, how, and why – you can have a hundred brilliant ideas. But which of the one hundred brilliant ideas gets your 5-year plan realized in 5 months?
That’s your million-dollar question right there.
The essential cut
In lieu of an answer, here is a magical model that can help you make some sharp cuts into your projects, so that their outline gets to be so clear and precise that even you could mistake it for your samurai’s blade in daylight.
In any work that requires a process of scaling (up or down), what you work with is essentializing.
The beautiful thing about essentializing is that it never requires anything but attention to intensity.
- How intense are you? How soft?
- When do you charge? When do you retreat?
- When do you go into offence? When do you go into defense?
- When do you expand? When do you contract?
- When do you inhale? When do you exhale?
Imagine you have a project (whether business or marriage) and you get the momentum wrong. You go to war when you’d be better off retreating. You take a break and hide, when you’d better off filling your lungs with breath and shout at the top of them so the whole land can hear you, or you relax when you’d be better of alert.
Momentum is key, because focus requires the recognition of when the time is right for something.
So let’s see if this model below can inspire you to get more conscious of your moves.
The idea is to align your choice to charge ahead, which is anchored into a moment that you have control over, with the consequence of having charged ahead, which is anchored in a moment that you don’t have control over.
Choices are yours. Consequences are not. Choices are subject to internal conditions. Consequences are subject to external conditions. The art is to know the difference and make your cuts in accordance.
As this model is original, yet based on a classical spread, I call it The Samurai’s Cut. If you refer to it outside of the context of this essay, please give courteous credit to my work with cartomantic models.
The Samurai’s Cut
Take out the suit of swords, pip cards and court cards alike.
Place the Ace of Swords in the middle. Make your significator the King of Swords (even if you’re a woman).
Shuffle the remaining 13 cards. Place them on top and around the Ace of Swords in the following order.
10 5 12
7 3 1 2 6
13 4 11
Let your first card cover the Ace. The Ace, the initial power to cut is your invisible cloak.
The center card (1) is your card of focus for your ‘what, how, and why.’
The inner cross (2, 3, 4, 5) relates to the intensity of what you give (2) and what you receive (3) and to the intensity of how you go from the many ideas you literally walk on (5) to the one essential idea in your head (4).
The outer cross (6, 7, 8, 9) relates to the same as above, but here with an added consciousness of cardinality. Think cardinal points: East, West, South, North.
Can you see beyond your immediate circle, out into the world? What agency do you have there? Is your project strong enough beyond your own agency?
This involves taking the intensity of your one, essential idea to the power of 10. This is another way of saying that you think essentially, but way beyond your power to act.
This is also another way of saying that you take the intensity of your one essential idea to a magical realm, where it receives special oomph, or mojo, from the very fixity of the point (a point that is either contracted or expanded, active or passive). The pip cards are in passive or active mode, while the court cards represent the hands of another, helping or opposing.
The diagonal lines going from cards 10 to 11 across the center card and 12 to 13 also across the center card, is your X marking the spot.
What intensity crosses your focus? One of inhaling, or one of exhaling? One of charging ahead, or one of retreating?
Getting to know this is important if you want to hit the target of your ‘what, how, and why.’
Let’s look at an example:
A quick glance at the image here may seem daunting, but you have to keep in mind the scope of this, which is to get a sense of the intensity required for you to cut things to the bone.
So what we’re looking for is this: Big time breathing time? Or big time pausing time? A brief inhaling or exhaling moment, or a quick draw?
One is many, ten is a lot. If you’re looking at a lot of swords in your strategic positions, then chances are that things are heavily intense.
The next thing you want to assess is this:
Is this heavy intensity active or passive? Do we have just clenched swords ready to burst, and hence can detect some breathing suggested by the white space with flowers in the middle, or do we have an interlocking of swords and an active one stabbing in the middle? (the difference between the even cards, the ‘breathing’ ones, and the odd ones, the ‘eager’ ones).
Let’s see what we got here, more concretely as it relates to where the focus is and how this focus relates to the ‘what, how, and why.’
The center card also indicates what needs work on in terms of focus.
Here, over the Ace of Swords, we find the Page of Swords, an inactive card. Among the court cards, the Page of Swords is the one that lacks focus the most. A young man is often distracted and hardly ever on point.
This is also a card that spells out suspicion. You neither go to war, nor stay at home. In either case, if someone were to ask the Page of Swords what his agenda was, he’d be very much in doubt.
The only thing he’d know is that it’s related to learning something vague about fencing.
Now, if the project at hand is one that needs a lift off, because it operates with a brilliant idea, finding the Page of Swords here, rendering everything cloudy and grey, already gives us something to think about:
There’s trouble precisely with the momentum. The Page of Swords doesn’t have it.
How to get it, then?
We want to ask this question, simply because this model is intended as a magical model aimed at enhancing your awareness of how your many ideas about ‘what, how, and why’ can be reduced to one essential idea.
The underlying structure of this magical model is to cut. Cut through, and cut to the bones. Cut through emotion, intellect, and eagerness. What we want is a cold blade, not a shoulder to cry on.
If we wanted sympathy, we might just as well use the whole deck, and look at the variables outlined in the model above in that way, from the perspective of the whole force of the Tarot deck. Mind you, you can try that too already, as it’s fun and enlightening. But my aim here is to simply say something about the dynamics involved in reducing scope.
So, the Page of Swords. On the inner cross level, he gives nothing (6 swords in passive mode) without checking first with mother (Queen of Swords).
This can be both good and bad, depending on what the aim is. What we do know, by just looking at the horizontal axis, is that giving and receiving is mediated by a higher force. The Queen is higher in rank, creating here a relation of dependency. So the project’s focus as represented by the Page of Swords – who is not very focused – needs a helping pair of eyes, or, indeed, an extra sword.
How does the Page of Swords move from many ideas to the one? It looks like he’s doing a good job at reducing. We go from 7 swords to 3, all in active mode, with one sword piercing each its group. So the gloomy project can get sharper and simpler.
We can infer that the moment of inhaling, checking with the higher power is beneficial. We take this message as part of what is essential in this project. Better safe than sorry.
In terms of scaling, we find the querent’s significator, the King of Swords in the South, mirroring 9 Swords in the North. The pole star itself is guiding this.
Those who are familiar with classical cartomancy would immediately identify these positions with the major kill. Traditionally, the card of 9 Swords has been associated with Death. The King mirroring the most intense card in the suit of swords is indicative of a lot of expansive deadly power. You don’t just go for it, but you kill it too. This is excellent.
What we also can say here is this:
While the project is in hesitant mode, the power to execute it beyond mere pro-action or even doubt is great. This is good news for the project, as it means that whatever it consists of, even clouds, and insofar as here it can be reduced to simpler and therefore more powerful forms, it has the potential to exceed its specific locality and its weather forecast.
The horizontal axis of the outer cross is also powerful, as we find here more active and intense cards. The Knight of Swords charges ahead from the East, impacting on the Page, and all the way to the Queen via the 6 as a vehicle, a Queen who is busy orchestrating the world in the West. Ten swords in her face is a lot of swords, but it looks like she can handle unclenching them with her one powerful act.
Thus, to have the cardinal points covered by a lot of active power is good news, as this tells us that the project can go somewhere, especially if it stays focused on what it can receive locally: a shot (6 swords) of truth (the Queen being an emblem thereof).
In other words, the magic here is to be aware of the power to stay informed without exhibiting eagerness, until the many ideas become no more than 3, with one sword covering, indeed, each of the areas of focus: what, how, and why.
If we look at how the X marks the spot, the diagonal lines, we observe the following:
We go from 5 to 8, with the 5 swords in active mode, and from 4 to 2 swords, another reduction, in the final card in the model.
Translating this relation into the samurai’s move, we can say that what crosses the project, in the sense of sealing it, is playing an active part (5S) that’s then thrust upon a receiving community (8S).
Well, the good news is that the King can do that. As it happens here, he even touches the very cards, from a warm, domestic spot often associated with the South.
Consequently, as there are no surprises, things stabilize in the 4, with the final distribution of power going to 2.
We could continue by looking also at the trios of cards surrounding the inner cross, as they also show impacting influences. For instance, the trio, 5 swords, 10 swords, 2 swords impacting the Queen, indicates what the Queen is up against, namely, an increasing active force that she however cuts through, thus lessening the tension surrounding the project’s expansive potentiality.
Killing it softly
In conclusion, we can say that the magic of this project consists in the power to kill IT, after dealing with hesitation, and then to stay sovereign.
Since the Ace is always hidden at the center, the 2 Swords is the lowest visible in the spread, and therefore singular. The King touches it, as noted already, receives its gift of singularity, and then passes it on to the group of 8, the other card that he touches.
What you want to observe in the end is precisely what cards the significator touches. Card 13 ends the model, so to speak, but the King of Swords must be seen in relation to how this ending goes.
At the level of personhood, insofar as the first card down, signifying the focus of the project, is a court card, we can say that the project and the significator are linked by having the same nature, they are in the same family, both being courts.
The project starts small, as a child would, but is in the hands of someone who has direct power to act, as testified here also by the presence of the killer card itself in mirror relation to the King, the 9 Swords.
If the King mirrored the 2 swords in the position of marking the possibility to get this project boosted to ’10 times more its power,’ then the conclusion would have been different, as the intensity to carry out the one essential idea would not have been enough to sustain momentum.
Thus it goes to show. Just looking at one suit of cards placed in a strategic model that answers specific concerns is enough to give us an impression precisely of the extent to which the idea for a project matches momentum and the determined focus for it.
Now, the above is a magic model because you can take the conclusion of your analysis and turn it into a mantra for what you want to achieve. For example this:
Hesitance kills it. By killing hesitance you kill IT. Honor your protectors.
Slightly unpacked, this is to say that if you hesitate too much, you’re in danger of losing momentum, thus killing the very potentiality of the simplified idea to get beyond even your own power to act. By killing hesitance, you make the other kill, which is the power kill that the King of Swords is capable of when he teams up with the killer card.
Conversely, it’s good to have higher power surround you, protecting you, if you absolutely must take some time to reflect on what you’re doing. In this case here, having the Queen and the Knight in your line of what is given and what is received is not the worst.
We live by scaling our focus up and down, wide and narrow.
The art is to find the soft spot and cut through it like through a moonbeam. The soft spot will stay, as does a moonbeam, no matter how sharp the sword, but it will carry the trace of your swiftness and precision, and that’s exactly what you want to bring in alignment and achieve: vision, vigilance, and vigor.
Note on the layout: You can use this layout for the other three suits in the deck. Just create the appropriate question and context.
Note on the cards: Jean Noblet Marseille Tarot, 1650, reconstructed by Jean-Claude Flornoy.
Stay in the loop for new cartomantic activities.