Image sent to me courtesy of Veronique van der Meijden, during a live webinar.
Her cat was most attentive to what I was saying in class.
I take this as a very good sign.
One way to describe what I’m doing in my classes is through the words of the students:
I’m seeing how you go about this as organic (with respect to seeing things as they are) and subversive (as to habits and conditioning to do the opposite). When the Fox came up in a question about work, I got stuck in, ‘Oh no, I remember something somewhere stating a theory about fox = work.’ I knew that this = that would not square with your approach, but then got myself stuck in the reverse, wanting the Fox not to have anything do with work just because someone somewhere said it did. It seems to me that your approach both subverts the mere incantation of convention and honors the organic function. I needed to let go even of the meaning of ‘no meaning,’ returning to the source to see the function implicit in the image. Big thanks – this is one of those lessons that go to the bone!
– Yeshe Francisco, translator and Tibetan Lama.
It’s all about conflict and how to overcome it.
It’s all about reading the grand tableau and nothing but. Mystery, drama, perception, and shooting a straight arrow. You know your method, and what to do with it. You are not its slave. You are its master.
Wherein I send to your inbox 11 Tarot prompts, 11 mini-lessons to inspire you.
I don’t ask the questions. The cards do. And sometimes they formulate your spells.
Past tracks are available on the topics of Coping, Voice, Sovereignty, Infinity, and Encounters. Check the prompts website here.
The latest is on the topic of The House.
NOT a class in memorization, or in what people say. NOT EVEN a class in deduction.
It’s a class in seeing what you see, and composition. How do you put it so the other you read the cards for gets it?
It’s a class in getting that ‘what you get’ is always anchored in your own circumstance and condition. When you read cards you just make clear what circumstance and condition is.
You go from seeing what IS to prediction, but the premise for seeing what IS and prediction is NOT one of ‘I know everything,’ but one of ‘I haven’t a bloody clue’.
You look at what happens in the space between claims to knowledge: ‘It will happen’, and ‘Relax: Just read the damn cards’.